10-07-2006, 03:29 PM
Anyone know what they hope to do yet? Post ideas in this thread to clarify....
I'm looking at distributed small-scale generators. The idea is that a group of houses share the capital cost and maintenance of a small wind turbine in an optimal position. This feeds electricity to the grid utilities (and unfortunately currently doesn't receive a standardised price in NZ- this should improve soon....), who then distribute it normally. The houses continue to receive power bills from their conventional utilities but pay them off using the profit gained via their shared generator.
The beauty of the system is that the generators are not directly fed into their owners houses, so must only provide a given average of capacity per month. The grid will act as a buffer to supply/demand.
It obviously takes years to actually pay off the overheads (although sponsorship and subsidies are possible), but these loan repayments would in essence replace power bills -The scheme would provide a monthly income able to offset both the turbine maintenance and conventional power bill. More important would be the qualitative benefits, the knowledge that one is providing the grid with as much renewable energy as is being consumed. And of course if the owners move house, they still have their own generators- so paying off the investment and receiving the benefits thereof can continue regardless of home ownership.
I'd also like to really consider the relationship of the wind turbine to the landscape, think about kinetic sculpture etc.
uhhh.. sorry for being longwinded (heh)
I'm looking at distributed small-scale generators. The idea is that a group of houses share the capital cost and maintenance of a small wind turbine in an optimal position. This feeds electricity to the grid utilities (and unfortunately currently doesn't receive a standardised price in NZ- this should improve soon....), who then distribute it normally. The houses continue to receive power bills from their conventional utilities but pay them off using the profit gained via their shared generator.
The beauty of the system is that the generators are not directly fed into their owners houses, so must only provide a given average of capacity per month. The grid will act as a buffer to supply/demand.
It obviously takes years to actually pay off the overheads (although sponsorship and subsidies are possible), but these loan repayments would in essence replace power bills -The scheme would provide a monthly income able to offset both the turbine maintenance and conventional power bill. More important would be the qualitative benefits, the knowledge that one is providing the grid with as much renewable energy as is being consumed. And of course if the owners move house, they still have their own generators- so paying off the investment and receiving the benefits thereof can continue regardless of home ownership.
I'd also like to really consider the relationship of the wind turbine to the landscape, think about kinetic sculpture etc.
uhhh.. sorry for being longwinded (heh)